⚖️ Legal Sandook Supreme Court judgments

Supreme Court of India

Diwakar Shrivastava and Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.

[1984] 2 S.C.R. 7921984 INSC 25
Decided02-02-1984
BenchO. Chinnappa Reddy
Case typeCivil Appeal
SubjectEducation & Reservation
ResultDismissed
CNRESCR010001181984
Open the judgment (PDF)

Judgment

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Cu1NNAPPA REDDY, J. The appellants in the several appeals before us question th' relaxation granted· to candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes and t)le Scheduled Tribes in regard to the minimum qualifying marks for admission into the medical colleges of the State of Madhya Pradesh. We are afraid we have to throw out these appeals on the preliminary ground that the persons likely to be affected if we agree with the submissions made on behalf of the appellants, that is, the candidates belonging tot he Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes who have secured admission into the medical colleges as a result of the relaxation granted to them have not been brought before us by being properly impleaded as parties. We fail to see how the question of the legality or validity of the reb.xation granted in their favour can possibly be dedded in their absence.

Rules of natural justice apply as much to proceedings in courts of law as to proceedings before authorities elsewhere. It may be that where a general question is involved and a large number of persons are .concerned, the court may, in appropr_iate cases, permit a few of them to be sued in a representative capacity ,or may· consider them as sufficiently represented by a few who have been properly impleaded as parties. That is not the situation here. No effort has been made to implead any person likely to be affected as a party to the proceeding. All the appeals are liable to be dismissed on this short ground. The learned counsel for the appellants urged that some seats reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes which have not been filled' on account of non-availability of candidates (1984] 2 '.C.R. have to be transferred to the general category under the. rules and are, therefore, available for candidates coming under the general category.

The counsel for the appellants suggests that the several appellants may be accommodated against these vacancies and directed to be admitted into one or other of the medical colleges. So far as admission to medical colleges for the year 1982-83 is concerned, it is stated in the additional counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the first respondont that ail the seats including those transferred from the reserved category to the general cotegory have been filled and there are no more vacancies. It .is, therefore, un· necessery to give any direction in Civil Appeal Nos. 6407 and 6408 . which relate to the year 1982-83. The other appeals relate to admissions during the year !983-84. In these cases, we have no definite information as to the number of vac~ncies available.

Even if there are a large number of vacancies, we cannot give any direction to admit the appellants against those vacancies since we are not in a position to say that appellants are the best candidates from the general category. All that we can do is to say that if on account of non-availabity of candidates from the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, there are any vacancies which are required to be transferred to tho general category under the rules, such vacancies may be filled up from the general category on the basis of merit. We do not have any doubt that this will be done. Subject to this direction, the appeals are dismissed. H.S.K. Appeals disrnssed.